Praise for Peter Aleshires The Fox and the Whirlwind
"Superbly crafted." — Dallas Morning News
"Offers a refreshing approach to understanding the Apache wars, allowing readers to grasp the conflict from multiple perspectives." — Library Journal
"An invaluable addition to western history." — Evans Connell, Author of Son of the Morning Star
"Written like fine historical fiction, but substantial, substantive, enlightening." &mdashKirkus Reviews
An Alternate Selection of the Military Book Club
Praise for Peter Aleshires The Fox and the Whirlwind
"Superbly crafted." — Dallas Morning News
"Offers a refreshing approach to understanding the Apache wars, allowing readers to grasp the conflict from multiple perspectives." — Library Journal
"An invaluable addition to western history." — Evans Connell, Author of Son of the Morning Star
"Written like fine historical fiction, but substantial, substantive, enlightening." &mdashKirkus Reviews
An Alternate Selection of the Military Book Club
A well-intentional but unsatisfying life of the Apache warrior,
"arguably the only Native American leader to actually win his war
with the United State of America."
Aleshire (American Studies/Arizona State Univ.); "The Fox and the
Whirlwind: General George Crook and Geronimo," 2000), begins his
life of Cochise, the great Chiricahua Apache fighter and
strategist, with an apology: because the conventional
historiography of the 19th-century American West does not allow for
Native American voices, he asserts, he has had to use considerable
invention in looking at Apache history from an Apache point of
view. That's all well and good, but Aleshire takes a few long
stretches in recounting the eventful, violence-plagued life of
Cochise (1804?-74), who had his hands full battling Mexicans and
Americans while trying to secure a homeland that would be safe from
intruders, while at the same time trying to rein in ambitious,
bellicose compatriots like Geronimo. For one thing, Aleshire
attributes to Cochise ideas and statements that no reliable history
corroborates ("Cochise especially likes this story," he writes at
one point before relating a folktale gathered by an anthropologist
in the late 1930s); for another, he tends to crib rather heavily
from the ethnographic literature, and the best lines here are often
those of writers such as Morris Opler, Eve Ball, and Keith Basso;
for still another, Aleshire has an unfortunate habit of writing in
a sort of noble-savage pastiche that's thick with simile from the
Chief Dan George school of Indian rhetoric ("Cochise felt caught in
the midst of his enemies, like the deer who hear the echo of the
wolves ahead and behind"; "He had steeled his heart, likea knife
heated and quenched"; "Now Cochise's heart leaped up in his chest,
like an eagle lunging against a tether"). The surfeit of
conjecture, sentimentality, and stentorian tone works, in the end,
against Aleshire's reliability as a narrator and historian, and it
makes this a chore to read.
Readers with a serious interest in Cochise's life and times will
prefer less self-conscious lives, such as Edwin Sweeny's "Cochise"
and David Robert's "Once They Moved Like the Wind," to Aleshire's
imaginative treatment. ("Kirkus Reviews," July 1, 2001)
A well-intentional but unsatisfying life of the Apache warrior,
"arguably the only Native American leader to actually win his war
with the United State of America."
Aleshire (American Studies/Arizona State Univ.); "The Fox and the
Whirlwind: General George Crook and Geronimo," 2000), begins his
life of Cochise, the great Chiricahua Apache fighter and
strategist, with an apology: because the conventional
historiography of the 19th-century American West does not allow for
Native American voices, he asserts, he has had to use considerable
invention in looking at Apache history from an Apache point of
view. That's all well and good, but Aleshire takes a few long
stretches in recounting the eventful, violence-plagued life of
Cochise (1804?-74), who had his hands full battling Mexicans and
Americans while trying to secure a homeland that would be safe from
intruders, while at the same time trying to rein in ambitious,
bellicose compatriots like Geronimo. For one thing, Aleshire
attributes to Cochise ideas and statements that no reliable history
corroborates ("Cochise especially likes this story," he writes at
one point before relating a folktale gathered by an anthropologist
in the late 1930s); for another, he tends to crib rather heavily
from the ethnographic literature, and the best lines here are often
those of writers such as Morris Opler, Eve Ball, and Keith Basso;
for still another, Aleshire has an unfortunate habit of writing in
a sort of noble-savage pastiche that's thick with simile from the
Chief Dan George school of Indian rhetoric ("Cochise felt caught in
the midst of his enemies, like the deer who hear the echo of the
wolves ahead and behind"; "He had steeled his heart, likea knife
heated and quenched"; "Now Cochise's heart leaped up in his chest,
like an eagle lunging against a tether"). The surfeit of
conjecture, sentimentality, and stentorian tone works, in the end,
against Aleshire's reliability as a narrator and historian, and it
makes this a chore to read.
Readers with a serious interest in Cochise's life and times will
prefer less self-conscious lives, such as Edwin Sweeny's "Cochise"
and David Robert's "Once They Moved Like the Wind," to Aleshire's
imaginative treatment. ("Kirkus Reviews," July 1, 2001)
![]() |
Ask a Question About this Product More... |
![]() |