This book is the first study of late Hanafism in the early modern Ottoman Empire. It examines Ottoman imperial authority in authoritative Hanafi legal works from the Ottoman world of the sixteenth to nineteenth centuries CE, casting new light on the understudied late Hanafi jurists (al-muta'akhkhirun). By taking the madhhab and its juristic discourse as the central focus and introducing "late Hanafism" as a framework of analysis, this study
demonstrates that late Hanafi jurists assigned probative value and authority to the orders and edicts of the Ottoman sultan. This authority is reflected in the sultan's ability to settle juristic disputes, to order specific
opinions to be adopted in legal opinions (fatawa), and to establish his orders as authoritative and final reference points. The incorporation of sultanic orders into authoritative Hanafi legal commentaries, treatises, and fatwa collections was made possible by a shift in Hanafi legal commitments that embraced sultanic authority as an indispensable element of the lawmaking process.
This book is the first study of late Hanafism in the early modern Ottoman Empire. It examines Ottoman imperial authority in authoritative Hanafi legal works from the Ottoman world of the sixteenth to nineteenth centuries CE, casting new light on the understudied late Hanafi jurists (al-muta'akhkhirun). By taking the madhhab and its juristic discourse as the central focus and introducing "late Hanafism" as a framework of analysis, this study
demonstrates that late Hanafi jurists assigned probative value and authority to the orders and edicts of the Ottoman sultan. This authority is reflected in the sultan's ability to settle juristic disputes, to order specific
opinions to be adopted in legal opinions (fatawa), and to establish his orders as authoritative and final reference points. The incorporation of sultanic orders into authoritative Hanafi legal commentaries, treatises, and fatwa collections was made possible by a shift in Hanafi legal commitments that embraced sultanic authority as an indispensable element of the lawmaking process.
Note on Transliteration
List of Figures
About the Author
Introduction
Chapter 1. Ibn Nujaym: The Father of Late Hanafism?
Chapter 2. "The Sultan Says": Ottoman Sultanic Authority in Late
Hanafi Tradition
Chapter 3. If Abu Hanifa Were Here: Authority, Continuity, and
Revision in Late Hanafi Jurisprudence
Chapter 4. Ottoman Rationale for Codification: The Mecelle
Conclusion
Appendix A. Examples of Early and Late Hanafi Opinions in Ibn
Abidin's Hashiya
Appendix B. Examples of Ma'rudat in al-Haskafi's al-Durr
al-Mukhtar
Appendix C. Examples of Early and Late Hanafi Opinions in Radd
al-Muhtar
Appendix D. Examples of Ma'rudat Abi al-Su'ud in Radd al-Muhtar
Appendix E. Thematic Tables of the Mecelle Articles
Bibliography
Samy A. Ayoub is an Assistant Professor of Law and Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Texas at Austin.
"Ayoub's meticulous study casts a much-needed light on the
creativity and innovation of the late Hanafi tradition. By focusing
on the tradition from within, Law, Empire, and the Sultan makes a
significant contribution to the scholarly debate on the nature of
the Islamic legal order in general and in recent centuries in
particular." -- Guy Burak, Librarian for Middle Eastern, Islamic
and Jewish Studies, New York University
"Professor Samy Ayoub's Law, Empire, and the Sultan challenges the
view that Muslim jurists operated outside of political authority by
showing how Ottoman Hanafi scholars from the sixteenth to
nineteenth centuries endorsed the Sultan's role in lawmaking. This
rich account of late Hanafi jurisprudence should appeal to those
with interests in Islamic law, Ottoman history, and processes of
legal change." -- Shirin Sinnar, Professor of Law, Stanford Law
School
"Samy Ayoub's book is an important contribution to the growing
field of Ottoman legal studies. Using the writings of what he calls
'late Hanafis,' Ayoub demonstrates that the Ottoman sultan played
an active role in shaping the empireâs legal system. This
distinctive tradition of legal thinking was the basis from which
nineteenth century legal reform and codification began. This book
is a required reading for anyone interested in Islamic legal
history,
Ottoman history, and the origins of legal modernity in the Middle
East." -- Adam Sabra, Professor and King Abdul Aziz Ibn Saud Chair
in Islamic Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara
"In Law, Empire, and the Sultan, Samy Ayoub offers a fresh
perspective on two of the most widely debated issues in Islamic
legal history: the relationship between fiqh as a 'jurists law' and
the authority of temporal rulers, and the process of codification.
The study adds substance to the growing recognition that the rise
of the nation state did not represent a sudden rupture in the
development of Islamic legal discourses, but was preceded by
significant developments in scholarly attitudes toward the legal
authority of rulers. Rather than focusing on the agency of the
Ottoman state, Ayoub offers a perspective from within the
intellectual and religious world
of Ottoman legal scholars." -- Marion Katz, Professor of Middle
Eastern and Islamic Studies, New York University
"Professor Ayoub's Law, Empire, and the Sultan is an important
contribution to the study of late Hanafism in the Ottoman Empire,
and a very welcome complication of clichéd claims that Islamic Law
was purely a jurists' law. This book is both an important
contribution in Islamic legal history and to our understanding of
the role of the state in the jurisprudence of Islamic law." --
Mohammad Fadel, Professor of Law, University of Toronto Faculty
of
Law
![]() |
Ask a Question About this Product More... |
![]() |