When the State Meets the Street probes the complex moral lives of street-level bureaucrats: the frontline social and welfare workers, police officers, and educators who represent government's human face to ordinary citizens. Too often dismissed as soulless operators, these workers wield a significant margin of discretion and make decisions that profoundly affect people's lives. Combining insights from political theory with his own ethnographic fieldwork as a receptionist in an urban antipoverty agency, Bernardo Zacka shows us firsthand the predicament in which these public servants are entangled.
Public policy consists of rules and regulations, but its implementation depends on how street-level bureaucrats interpret them and exercise discretionary judgment. These workers are expected to act as sensible moral agents in a working environment that is notoriously challenging and that conspires against them. Confronted by the pressures of everyday work, they often and unknowingly settle for one of several reductive conceptions of their responsibilities, each by itself pathological in the face of a complex, messy reality. Zacka examines the factors that contribute to this erosion of moral sensibility and what it takes to remain a balanced moral agent in such difficult conditions.
Zacka's revisionary portrait reveals bureaucratic life as more fluid and ethically fraught than most citizens realize. It invites us to approach the political theory of the democratic state from the bottom-up, thinking not just about what policies the state should adopt but also about how it ought to interact with citizens when implementing these policies.
When the State Meets the Street probes the complex moral lives of street-level bureaucrats: the frontline social and welfare workers, police officers, and educators who represent government's human face to ordinary citizens. Too often dismissed as soulless operators, these workers wield a significant margin of discretion and make decisions that profoundly affect people's lives. Combining insights from political theory with his own ethnographic fieldwork as a receptionist in an urban antipoverty agency, Bernardo Zacka shows us firsthand the predicament in which these public servants are entangled.
Public policy consists of rules and regulations, but its implementation depends on how street-level bureaucrats interpret them and exercise discretionary judgment. These workers are expected to act as sensible moral agents in a working environment that is notoriously challenging and that conspires against them. Confronted by the pressures of everyday work, they often and unknowingly settle for one of several reductive conceptions of their responsibilities, each by itself pathological in the face of a complex, messy reality. Zacka examines the factors that contribute to this erosion of moral sensibility and what it takes to remain a balanced moral agent in such difficult conditions.
Zacka's revisionary portrait reveals bureaucratic life as more fluid and ethically fraught than most citizens realize. It invites us to approach the political theory of the democratic state from the bottom-up, thinking not just about what policies the state should adopt but also about how it ought to interact with citizens when implementing these policies.
Bernardo Zacka is a research fellow at the Center for Ethics in Society at Stanford University and a junior research fellow at Christ’s College, University of Cambridge.
When the State Meets the Street reads as one might imagine a
collaboration between Bernard Williams, Richard Sennett, and James
Scott could turn out. If there can be such a thing as an instant
classic, this book is one.
*David Owen, University of Southampton*
In this refreshing study, Zacka finds in the commonplace
decision-making of street level bureaucrats an implicit but
coherent moral structure. When citizens experience the state
through street-level encounters, the author shows, they are subject
to moral reasoning no less than when elected officials expand or
contract social welfare policies, or bring a nation to war.
*Michael Lipsky, author of Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of
the Individual in Public Services*
Beautifully written, tightly argued, and totally original.
*Michael Piore, Massachusetts Institute of Technology*
In his groundbreaking book When the State Meets the Street: Public
Service and Moral Agency, Bernardo Zacka illustrates a new
methodological approach for political theory, opens up avenues of
normative research on the neglected topic of bureaucracy and
bureaucrats and overturns an intellectually dubious, but
nonetheless dominant, model of the state…Zacka’s discussion is
subtle and thoughtful and opens many avenues for political and
moral theorists to explore.
*LSE Review of Books*
This book…not only offers a valuable contribution to the
street-level bureaucracy literature, but is also an essential read
for political theorists interested in a bottom-up account of the
state.
*Acta Politica*
Zacka’s application of normative theory to state-level bureaucrats
and his efforts at injecting ethnographically informed descriptive
evidence into political theory are to be applauded and should
represent a vanguard in political theory.
*Administrative Science Quarterly*
An exemplary and exquisitely written book from which sociologists
have much to learn.
*American Journal of Sociology*
Drawing from first-hand observations adds an anthropological
sensitivity to the book, in the process showing that political
philosophers have much to gain from venturing into the real world.
The result is an original book that most democratic theorists
should read, especially those interested in moral reasoning in
everyday life.
*Constellations*
Zacka persuasively argues that street-level bureaucrats are, in
fact, moral agents ‘vested with a considerable margin of
discretion.’ More importantly, he makes a compelling case for the
normative desirability of that discretionary power…The book draws
on a broad array of literatures, from other qualitative work on
bureaucracies to psychology, sociology, and normative political
philosophy, providing Zacka with an astounding and productive array
of interlocutors…Zacka’s remarkable book opens up many intriguing
questions and will hopefully be one of many future studies that
combine the virtues of an ethnographic approach and normative
political theory.
*Contemporary Political Theory*
Drawing eclectically from a breathtakingly wide range of sources
and disciplinary approaches to the study of politics, policy, and
organizations, Zacka develops a robust and analytically rigorous
framework for understanding street-level work that builds on, and
ultimately surpasses, Lipsky’s original treatment in several
respects.
*Contemporary Sociology*
It is wide-ranging in its theoretical breadth, evocative in its
traversing of theory and practice, and convincing in its
marshalling of argument. Above all, it is stylish. It makes
bureaucracy—largely neglected in contemporary political theory as
technical, apolitical, mundane—intellectually sexy…Brilliant.
*Critical Policy Studies*
When the State Meets the Street offers an innovative take on the
conditions of and possibilities for frontline workers’ moral
agency. Further, the strength of this work is grounded in Zacka's
engagement with previous qualitative research on frontline workers,
moving seamlessly from vocational rehabilitation agents in the
United States to immigration agents in France…An essential
read.
*Governance*
A thoughtful book that usefully brings the tools of political
theory to bear on questions of public administration. It argues
persuasively that democratic theorists need to pay attention not
just to the principles and the institutions that shape our laws but
also to the street-level bureaucrats who interpret and apply
them.
*Perspectives on Politics*
One emerges from this insightful book with a considerable measure
of respect for bureaucrats...Studying their experience as well as
their behavior, is indeed, 'an experiment in living,' as well as a
test of our own values and vision. It is, or should be,
humbling.
*Psychology Today*
An examination of street level bureaucracy rooted in
anthropological fieldwork, but with the philosopher’s toolkit
dexterously deployed, it announces [Zacka] as a major new
voice.
*Political Quarterly*
Since Michael Lipsky coined the term in 1969, street-level
bureaucracy has developed into a scholarly theme of its own.
Nevertheless, the normative dimensions of the work done in this
segment of government bureaucracy have remained almost entirely in
the shadow so far. Filling this lacuna the book is an absolute
must-read.
*Public Administration*
An excellent piece of work that will interest researchers, current
and future policy makers, public administrators, and nonprofit
leaders as well as students. But more importantly, as part of the
need to integrate more political science in the study of public
administration, this is a book that is particularly important to
political scientists and implementation scholars.
*Public Administration Review*
When the State Meets the Street is both a strikingly original work
and a penetrating analysis of governmental decision-making. Not
only is the book a sophisticated deconstruction of the
administrative state, it also encourages liberty-minded readers to
expand their intellectual horizons beyond the traditional
citizen-government relationship.
*The University Bookman*
From its novel theorizing about the normative underpinnings of
discretion to the nuanced discussion of the ‘impossible situations’
faced by street-level bureaucrats, When the State Meets the Street
is essential reading that ought to inform the work of scholars and
practitioners alike.
*Social Service Review*
A sophisticated and empirically rich theorization of street-level
agency and discretion. Through close and evocative appreciation of
the conflicts and dilemmas posed by street-level work, it yields
numerous valuable insights into everyday practice.
*Social Policy & Administration*
A really rich and rewarding read. It fizzes with stimulating
insights and ideas and offers the kind of empathetic portrayal of
street-level bureaucracy which participant-observation is
particularly good at.
*Social & Legal Studies*
A bold and interesting contribution…Given the recent ‘behavioral
turn’ in public administration, Zacka’s unique efforts to
understand individual behavior in relation to social dynamic
provides an alternative, serious mezzo-level explanation that
should not be overlooked.
*American Review of Public Administration*
An unusual work of political theory, invigorating and innovative in
terms of its methodology and argumentative thread…Its arguments are
the result of a reflection on observed practices and on
interpretations and analyses of similar practices in philosophical
and social scientific literatures. The perceptiveness and care with
which it builds taxonomies for the intra- and interpersonal
challenges involved in navigating the normative demands of
street-level bureaucracy are an outstanding example of this
approach. This perceptiveness and care allow Zacka to address
several audiences differently, thus providing orientation for
political theorists, for street-level practitioners and their
managers, and for citizens dealing with public services. Each of
these audiences may come away with changed views.
*Polity*
![]() |
Ask a Question About this Product More... |
![]() |